You know this cycle

The problem this solves.

Nobody on the team can say whether you show up in ChatGPT for the queries that matter.

A competitor is cited for a comparison query and you are not, and nobody noticed until a prospect mentioned it.

Tools that just report AI mentions do not tell you what to do about the gap.

Weekly
AI citation checks, per query, per engine
Multi-engine
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews tracked
$1M+
Organic revenue attributed where AI + traditional search overlap
0
Gaps left as a report with no next step

What you get

Built for this, not adapted from a generic package.

Citation tracking that means something

  • Brand-mention rate and citation share tracked weekly, per query
  • Competitor coverage on the same queries, so you know where you stand
  • Tracked across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews

Gaps become work, not a dashboard

  • Every uncited query becomes a content or technical task automatically
  • Content structured for direct-answer extraction, not just keyword targeting
  • Entity and schema markup built so engines can attribute the answer to you

One loop, not two reports

  • AI visibility and traditional SEO run through the same content pipeline
  • A single attribution view for organic and AI-cited traffic
  • No separate "AEO team" reinventing what the SEO team already knows

Case study

Diagnosing a traffic decline before it became an AI-visibility problem.

The Challenge

Helpling Singapore saw a 25% organic traffic decline and needed to know whether it was a ranking problem, a seasonality problem, or an emerging AI-search visibility gap before committing budget to a fix.

Our Solution

We ran the diagnosis against seasonal patterns, ranking history, and citation data together, isolating the decline to seasonality rather than a structural or AI-visibility issue, so the response stayed proportional to the actual cause.

Results Achieved

-25%
Traffic decline explained
diagnosed to seasonality

FAQ

Be the answer in AI search. — frequently asked questions

No. Prompt tracking tells you where you are cited. We track that, then turn every gap into an actual content or technical task, and ship the fix. The loop closes with shipped work, not a static report.
ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, weekly, per query. Coverage expands as new engines become material to your traffic mix.
It runs through the same pipeline, not a separate one. Content built for AI-engine citation also tends to perform in traditional search, because both reward clear, well-structured, directly-answering content. We do not split this into two competing workstreams.
Yes. Competitor coverage is tracked on the same queries you are, so you see where they are cited and you are not, and vice versa.
Citation share and brand-mention rate are tracked as leading indicators. Where AI-cited traffic overlaps with attributable revenue (demo requests, sign-ups, purchases), we tie it back through the same attribution setup as your traditional organic traffic.

The ask

Find the gap between what you buy and own.

Tell us your domain, your paid spend, and what your CRM shows about pipeline. A one-pager back within a business week, showing your current AI-search exposure.

  • Free paid-organic gap analysis
  • No account access required to start
  • A one-pager back within a business week